The main problem with poker books (continued)
Before I go any further then I need to say that I have derived most of my education from poker books and so I cannot really fault them. However there is one overriding problem with poker books and this is that they do leave an awful lot open to interpretation. In fact it is very difficult not to interpret something in your own words when you read a book. This often leads to people having a very warped and misguided view of what the author is actually trying to say. I believe that poker books hinder as many people as they help.
The process is a twofold one, firstly the player looks to educate themselves and there is fundamentally nothing wrong with this. Players rapidly move away from first base when they seek out education. However everyone else who is serious about the game also seeks out education and so what makes you think that your information is superior to someone else’s? Clearly then once you have moved beyond a certain level then your opponents are every bit as keen and dedicated as what you are.
However what you need to remember is that there is really only one measure of success and that is how much you win over what period of time. I think that you need to educate yourself in what can happen at a poker table but you also need to learn how to think as well. There is little point in allowing some book to do your thinking for you because the best that you will become is a player with more education than a beginner who then fails to make money once they move higher up.






